In other news I am tired and worn out. I plan on these being more art (whatever that means) oriented but for now to do it everyday I am focusing on fun and end-user input. And sleep deprivation. These have definitely been somewhat informed by sleep deprivation.
Commenting is truly unecessary, although flattery will get you everywhere. But particiapation (while not mandatory) can be fun for all involved. My text this time may have been confusing and I never really said why I was doing this so my latest entry may be helpful in explaining this.
So, for me, I like that the style of the bees and the . . . um. . . victim are different. It establishes the guy as a little more generic and normal than the threat established by the bees--if the bees were more cartoony or the little guy more detailed then the threat would be less.
However, I would like to see more depth of field. I'd like the three characters not to be standing on the same plane. Maybe the guy is further toward the foreground, and the left bee is a bit more upstage of the right bee.
Um. . . is that kind of stuff useful or interesting at all?
Well and honestly the bees are different because I actually had to think about what they would look like whereas the guy is my visual shorthand for cartoon me. In response to your question I believe I have hopefully clarified it here.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
no subject
no subject
However, I would like to see more depth of field. I'd like the three characters not to be standing on the same plane. Maybe the guy is further toward the foreground, and the left bee is a bit more upstage of the right bee.
Um. . . is that kind of stuff useful or interesting at all?
no subject
no subject
Thinking of the children, "Run! Bees!" would work well with two+ victims...
no subject
no subject