toosuto: (Default)
[personal profile] toosuto



Of course since it hasn't even been two weeks since the last one I've only got one picture. I am thinking that perhaps I will post pictures more often but less pictures per post (since Flikr hasn't made it easy for me to post multiple pictures per post (I have to do it one at a time, cut and past the code they generate, blah blah blah: NO ONE CARES REALLY, STOP BABBLING! So I'll probably post a new picture once every two weeks or so. Comments, opinions?

Also, it's your friends list that is loading: lj-cut or no lj-cut? My pics are optimized for the web (this one is approximately 60 K) so I am not sure if the cut is because most other people do it or some weird etiquette thing I don't understand (since load time is minimal).

Date: 1 Feb 2005 18:09 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blakthorne.livejournal.com
My opinion is that that's a disgustingly cute picture. Makes me all mooshy inside and stuff. *grin*

Date: 1 Feb 2005 18:14 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] goobermunch.livejournal.com
So cute. So very, very cute. That's m'girl.

--G

Date: 1 Feb 2005 18:38 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] toosuto.livejournal.com
And look she's all dressed up for church no less!

Date: 1 Feb 2005 18:24 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anymelanie.livejournal.com
I say, one pic, web-optimized, sans cut is just fine. In fact, watching my friends page load and seeing this wonderful picture kinda brightened my morning. Anyway, Sara and Rona are beautiful (duh), but the picture is extraordinary. If this is the kind of quality you're bringing, I say every two weeks is not an unforgivable amount of time between pics. Better a Very Good picture every so often than frequent, shitty pictures.

I need to take a photography class. I want to take pictures, too!

(btw, are you using a digital camera, or scanning pictures taken from a conventional camera?)

Date: 1 Feb 2005 18:37 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] toosuto.livejournal.com
I am shooting using a Kodak EasyShare DX6340 currently. You can monkey around with manual like settings if you have the patience (it's a menu driven annoyance but it's there if you want it.) I also know a few people with the equivalnet Canon Powershot and they seem pretty happy with that as a point and shoot as well. Eventually I will be able to afford this and have full and easy control again.

Yay for making people's days better! I may even start doing more picture post (of stuff other than the baby (as perfect as she is) a la [livejournal.com profile] kisken.

Date: 1 Feb 2005 20:10 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] k8cre8.livejournal.com
Beautiful! Great picture.

I think it's fine without the cut, I like seeing a lone picture without the extra clicking ;)

And, yeah. Best thing I've seen today...

Date: 1 Feb 2005 21:42 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kung-fu-monkey.livejournal.com
If I weren't such a crabby, unapproachable bastard, I'd say that pic is just way too damned cute. Y'know, like, cyoot!

But I am, so I won't.

cuuute baby--hot mamma

Date: 1 Feb 2005 22:49 (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Cute baby and a hot mamma :)

Re: cuuute baby--hot mamma

Date: 2 Feb 2005 14:58 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stowellian.livejournal.com
more photos! That goes for everyone. More photos. The more you have, the more you cut. But hey, isn't one of the joys of the intarwebs getting to see things you wouldn't otherwise? I would delight in spokane landscape/whatever shots myself.

PICTURE!!

Date: 2 Feb 2005 06:40 (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Being an Algebra student I can say with all confidence that

S+R=B(eautiful:)

However, when we realize that R cannot exist withput S to the power of J, one wonders where in this visual equasion this is represented.... let us review

S(J)=R and S+R=B, sooooooo S+J+R=B would also be true!

So when is that going to be visualy represented J?

HUGS!
FC Becky

Way to OCD

Date: 2 Feb 2005 15:45 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] toosuto.livejournal.com
That would be SJ=B

I think their may be a more correct forumla but it may take some sort of hyper-calculus.

I will show up in pictures when a)I accidentally post a picture with me in it or b) I start taking better pictures.

Date: 3 Feb 2005 06:46 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bryree.livejournal.com
Yea. More pictures. Defnitly more pictures. Yeah.

Date: 3 Feb 2005 15:46 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] toosuto.livejournal.com
Wait, is that pictures more often or more pictures but less often (resulting in neither a net loss or gain of pictures when averaged out over time)?

Date: 3 Feb 2005 16:17 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bryree.livejournal.com
Yeah. Defnitly yeah.


OK FINE, so tone of voice doesn't type well. Especially with typos. *sigh*

I'd love more often. Besides, if you want to get better (already very good, sir) at photography, more often gives more chances to practice...

Date: 3 Feb 2005 16:27 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] toosuto.livejournal.com
Tone of voice transmits pretty well but sometimes can be distorted. Plus I just like being obtuse.

Yeah, practice is good and thte camera I am using me forces me to have a more critical and analyzing eye. Although I am often irritated that it doesn't have the proper f stops for some of the pictures I want to take. But I am currently at 5% of my goal for the new camera fund. At this rate I'll have it in *sigh* 20 years.

OK so that math didn't make me happy. New plans will be formulated! To Action™!

Date: 3 Feb 2005 07:55 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] slownewsday.livejournal.com
ACK! She is the beautiful, Mister Josh. I've been out and I'm catching up now, but she is so precious! Those clear blue eyes make me melt.

Date: 3 Feb 2005 07:56 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] slownewsday.livejournal.com
Hmm...those comments could apply to either girl...

Too cute!

Date: 5 Feb 2005 16:25 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bugspit.livejournal.com
Wow! What a cute pic. (of course - I already knew that, being the grandfather of R). And what is even "more special" than you can imagine - I get to cuddle and play with her! How great is that? OK Josh - how about a dvd for the grandfather with (da da!) HOME MOVIES?

Re: Too cute!

Date: 5 Feb 2005 16:50 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] toosuto.livejournal.com
Well seeing as how that particular camera doesn't play with the Mac (I am really irritated about that) all home movies have to wait until I have incredibly easy access to a Windows XP machine with firewire ports or Apple finally makes their computer compatable with my camera. *sigh*

October 2013

S M T W T F S
  12345
67 89101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 22 February 2026 03:38
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios